Natalie Tran: White Male Asian Female

Wow, this documentary explains everything perfectly. I wasn’t expecting it to be so interesting much less that she addressed /r/hapas on Reddit. Interesting how Eurasian Tiger a.k.a. Tenda Spencer was so civilized with her and a douchebag to me. I still don’t believe his dad was a white Nazi. He looks half Jewish to me.

25 comments

  1. AJ · January 23

    watch this video

    Like

  2. AJ · January 25

    Part 2

    Like

    • Based Hapa · January 26

      And of course, I’m immediately attacked for expressing my opinion that I think ET looks half Jewish, not white. People are so stupid.

      Like

      • AJ · January 29

        Tweet to Natalie Tran.

        Like

      • Based Hapa · January 29

        Who are you? Do you seriously think she would reply to me? Tell me how you found my blog and who you are on social media. Do you follow me elsewhere?

        Like

  3. Based Hapa · January 25

    Thanks, I’ve subbed to Persephone.

    Like

  4. Anonymous White Male · July 30

    I’m a white male in an AFWM pairing. My IQ is top tier and I’ve dated women from a wide variety of phenotypes including those commonly miscategorized “racially” as “caucasian,” “asian,” and “native American,” as well as a “black” and an “Indian” woman. They were all university students intending to enter a profession or in a profession.

    My preference is for “Asian” women. I think they have softer skin, nicer hips/better legs, are more intelligent, and generally speaking, have nicer personalities than their sisters of differing phenotype. Unlike most “western” women, they are also not steeped in the blatant misandry that is third wave feminism, and are therefore simply easier for men to like and communicate and interact with.

    I also think there is a biological drive for people to mate with people who are genetically different from themselves. It produces offspring with stronger immune systems and if our offspring are anything to go by, superior intelligence. Therefore, contrary to the comments of critics of such relationships, it isn’t AFWM relationships that are “predicated on racism” and fraught with “racial” overtones, it is the relative scarcity of other pairings eg. WFAM, BFWM, WFIM, AFBM that is the consequence of “racist” attitudes. The relative rarity of these relationships points to real ugliness.

    Like

    • While I’m for free will, I don’t condone race-mixing for simple reason of preservation of the white race, which is a world minority. Because I am a race and IQ-realist, I say if you must mix, if you simply can’t resist “exotic” or “ethnic”, stick with East Asian or SEA. I definitely agree that there is a difficulty that men face with their own white women falling to 3rd wave feminism. White nationalists swear that a majority of their women are loyal to their race. I hope that is true, as it does not seem like it to me. I also don’t appreciate Asian or exotic fetishists, as that makes it seem like you are only interested in sex and not marriage and family.

      Like

  5. Anonymous White Male · July 31

    I forgot to mention cheekbones, which is ridiculous given your pic is right here, but Asian women also have great cheekbones.

    There is probably very little we agree on other than that third wave feminism is misandry, and that the phenotype that is described as “white” is a minority in the world. Those with the phenotype have brought the world a lot of technology in the last 2000 years, but also a lot of pain and suffering. There is no particular reason it is deserving of preservation in its own right, What is worthy of preservation are the genes within the phenotype that created intelligence, aggressiveness and intellectual vigor. Skin colour simply seems to be adaptive response to the duration and intensity of solar radiation.

    Lots of “white males” today prefer “Asian” women for the same reasons I do. They are more intelligent, better looking, fitter, and easier to like and get along with. With a few notable exceptions, they seem to be less likely to running screaming “harassment” if a man actually approaches them or looks at them with lust than their “Caucasian” sisters.

    “Yellow fever” isn’t a consequence of racism, fetishism, colonialism, or a desire for “racial domination.” It’s a consequence of lookism/biology, logic and rationality.

    Like

  6. Anonymous White Male · July 31

    We seem to have few points of ideological and philosophical agreement — perhaps as few as I have with Liberals — and there seems to be little common experience in our backgrounds.

    I’m more libertarian and libertine, and I have reasoned that as the technology, wealth and intelligence of our species continues to grow, socialist/communistic implementations will be necessary to avoid our species’ annihilation. Social structures that precipitate discord, alienation, desperation and terrorism will be highly
    problematic as the means of causing great havoc and destruction become more widely available and easily accessible or create-able. In essence, a point will ultimately be reached where repression, state security and militarism will no longer be capable of providing even elites with personal security. Happy, satisfied, secure people don’t retaliation kill and preventing retaliation killing in a more technologically advanced future will require allocation of resources to making people happy, satisfied and secure.

    Like

    • I agree that WMAF is not “racist”, but I will say that the scarcity of the other combos are due to the reasons you state for why you find Asians more attractive. I would advise you to not look at any female with lust in an inappropriate situation. That’s just creepy. In fact, you seem kinda creepy, lol…

      Yep, that would explain it, our differences. Libertarian and libertine. You put races and ethnicities in quotations, like they are social constructs instead of factual, just like liberals do. You won’t take a stand for what is right and wrong. You’re a moral relativist and want to live a life of decadence, with no accountability. That you also say socialist or communism might be necessary for happiness is what is called a “cuck”. But at least you admit to your fetishizing, due the rationale you stated. May I suggest you go hang out on all of Petite Nicoco’s social media. She’s a hapa libertarian and doesn’t mind being fetishized.

      Like

  7. Anonymous White Male · August 1

    Races and ethnicities are merely variant phenotypic expressions of one human animal, ethnicities also having a cultural/social component.

    I don’t hesitate to take stands for what I believe is right and wrong, my conceptions of right and wrong are simply differ from yours. I think human life has intrinsic value, and am anti-abortion, anti-war and anti-death penalty as a result. Unlike Liberals, I also believe tolerance is a supreme virtue and government has no business in the regulation of morals or the imposition of moral codes, ever.

    Everyone should be able to live a life of decadence or austerity, or any other lifestyle they wish. Removing the threat of economic scarcity, and the power differentials in society, will remove fillings of malice, hate, jealousy, and such, and lessen motives for retaliation and revenge killing. It is easy to see that these could cause great harm in a more technologically developed and reliant world. More than that, this will give people the ability to live the lifestyle of their choosing.

    I’m not sure why you think I fetishize, what you think I am fetishizing or where you think I admit to it.

    Social media… not for me thanks.

    Like

    • “I don’t hesitate to take stands for what I believe is right and wrong, my conceptions of right and wrong are simply differ from yours. I think human life has intrinsic value, and am anti-abortion, anti-war and anti-death penalty as a result. Unlike Liberals, I also believe tolerance is a supreme virtue and government has no business in the regulation of morals or the imposition of moral codes, ever.”

      I agree with this. But whatever. Bye.

      Like

  8. Anonymous White Male · August 1

    Since “races” aren’t “real,” “hapa” isn’t “real” either.

    Like

  9. Anonymous White Male · August 1

    Have a long, interesting, and happy life.

    Like

  10. Anonymous White Male · August 1

    I never read this part of your comment before and wanted to make a reply:
    “I agree that WMAF is not “racist”, but I will say that the scarcity of the other combos are due to the reasons you state for why you find Asians more attractive. I would advise you to not look at any female with lust in an inappropriate situation. That’s just creepy. In fact, you seem kinda creepy, lol…”

    I have my preferences, other people have theirs. Preferences are different and vary widely. For some people intelligence is not an important criteria, for others it is. For some women height is not an important criteria, for others it is. Some men like women with large behinds, some men like women with small behinds.

    There is enough variability in preferences to discount the notion that the scarcity of other combos exists for any reason other than prejudices.

    “Creepy.” Sounds so millennial third wave feminist. Don’t kid yourself. Any heterosexual man in the presence of an attractive, scantily clad woman, or a woman wearing a skin tight dress, will feel lust when he sees her. If you know men who try and tell you otherwise, they are liars or they are not heterosexual.

    Third wave feminists try to have heterosexual men penalized just for being and thinking like heterosexual men. That we are put off by this should surprise no one. The extent to which heterosexual men are put of is verifiable by, and reflected in, stats online dating companies have collected.

    Like

    • I have no problem with prejudice. Certainly, to each their own preference, I guess. And don’t kid yourself that I don’t know that straight men naturally react that way to seeing a woman dressing like a whore on the street. I expect that and understand that is a straight male reaction.

      Sorry you have a problem with my opinion about you. It’s just a word. I’m definitely not a feminist or a millenial.

      By the way, to sum up what you’re saying in these long comments here is this, which is absurd really: “I like cake, but dessert isn’t real” 😉

      Like

    • Oh and this “There is enough variability in preferences to discount the notion that the scarcity of other combos exists for any reason other than prejudices.”

      Since preferences vary widely, perhaps the scarcity demonstrates other peoples preferences. It’s like you’re saying “I’m not being prejudiced by liking Asian women, but the rest of you are for not liking black women”. Black women do tend to be loud and have big butts. Maybe most white guys don’t like that. You can’t be all superior snob and call others racist.

      In summary, I think we agree on a quite a lot of things except race (you are a denier, I’m a realist), I agree with you on the morality points, but apart from that, you sound like you’re a bit of a hippie new-ager libertarian. Don’t smoke too much pot, it kills your ability to get erections as you age. But I’m sure you’ll be using the Viagra when the time “comes”.

      Like

      • Anonymous White Male · August 2

        Calls me “creepy” but proceeds to speculate upon and comment about my future ability to get it up based upon some assumed drug use. Only men are “creepy”, only “caucasian” people can be “racist”, in Liberal and 3rd wave feminist identity politics la la land.

        “Creepy” is a misandrist word.

        Preferences vary widely, but the preference data doesn’t align with dating distribution, except with WMAF. The biological need for mating diversity is being offset by considerations having nothing to do with preference and everything to do with prejudice. The two word concepts are not the same. .

        Like

  11. Anonymous White Male · August 1

    It’s a word puritanical third wave feminists use.

    At first I didn’t understand your last paragraph, but after thinking about it I think I understand what you are saying and disagree. I like the general phenotype and beliefs and personalities of women racialists call “Asian.”

    When I say this I am fully aware I am generalizing. I am fully aware Koreans are different from Chinese who are different from Thai and Vietnamese, who are in turn different from Laotian, Filipino, and Malaysian. There are many distinct ethnicities in the peoples who inhabit Asia, just as there are many distinct ethnicities in the people who inhabit Europe. Also, there are undoubtedly a plethora of “Asian” women with whom I would not be at all compatible because of their world views and philosophies. Some of these women would also be man-hating third wave feminists. The percentage of “Asian” women who I would not be compatible with is just lower than the percentage of North American “caucasian” women who have been steeped in misandrist third wave feminism, and their own sense of privilege. It is this group that is also the most prejudiced of all demographics, they are lest likely to date a person of a differing phenotype.

    Within complex species, phenotypic variation is real. “Race” really is a social construct.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s